schoolfeasibility.co.uk

Feasibility study programme and risk register

Authored by Oliver Wakefield-Smith, Founder of Digital Signet. Working from RIBA Plan of Work 2020, RICS NRM1, BB103/BB104 and ESFA CIF 2026-27 rules.

The programme Gantt and the risk register are the two governance deliverables the trust board cares about most. Without them the feasibility output is design without context.

The programme Gantt

Typical feasibility runs four to ten weeks depending on RIBA span. The Gantt should show governor sign-off date, CIF or SRP submission date, planning pre-app feedback date, and the construction handover window the brief assumes.

Top risks for a school project

Planning refusal or delay (high impact, medium probability), asbestos discovery (high impact, medium probability for pre-1985 buildings), site access during term time (medium impact, high probability), funding-round outcome (high impact, variable), occupied-site phasing collapse (high impact, medium probability).

Scoring and ownership

Score 1-5 impact x 1-5 probability per HM Treasury Orange Book; assign single named owner per risk; review monthly through the engagement [source: HMT Orange Book, verified 2026-06-24].

What the DfE wants to see

For SRP and R&R submissions the DfE expects a programme to construction handover and a risk register with quantified impact, mitigations and owners.

Worked example for a 1980s secondary refurb

Top risk: asbestos discovery during strip-out. Probability 4, impact 5, score 20. Mitigation: R&D2 survey complete at Stage 1; £150k provisional sum in Cost Plan A; phasing flexibility built in.

Last reviewed against CIF 2026-27 round, RIBA POW 2020 and BB103/BB104 on 24 June 2026.